OpenSim reaches 95% compatibility with Second Life

According to OpenSim core developer Charles Krinke, there are 330 key functions in Second Life – and 300 of them have been fully implemented in OpenSim.

Of the remaining 30, half have to do with vehicle physics, he said.

These are the functions that allow virtual passengers to ride in virtual cars, for example, fly virtual planes, or race virtual horses.

Except for these functions, objects can be imported from Second Life to OpenSim, and work much the same way.

I’ve seen this for myself. Doors open and close, in OpenSim worlds, for example, just as they do in Second Life. My hair swings when I move my head.

I even have ducks swimming in my pond.

According to Krinke, animating objects happens through the use of scripts, and OpenSim supports the Second Life scripting language.

Except for those pesky vehicle physics scripts – and those are mostly done, he added.

“You can generally expect to get 90 percent of the functionality of a Second Life simulator,” he said.

Adam Frisby (left) and Charles Krinke (right), two of the core developers behind OpenSim.

Adam Frisby (left) and Charles Krinke (right), two of the core developers behind OpenSim.

The other major functions still missing from OpenSim are voice chats – as opposed to the typed kind of chats – and group functionality.

And I’ve seen all of these functions – vehicle physics, voice chat, and groups – being tested over the past few days.

In fact, according to Krinke’s fellow core developer Adam Frisby, the difference between OpenSim and Second Life is  no longer 5% but just 2%.

“It’s been narrowing recently,” said Frisby, who’s head of research and development at Shanghai-based DeepThink.

Is OpenSim about to catch up to Second Life in functionality? Kind of.

“The Second Life way is completely broken,” said Frisby.

Instead, the OpenSim developers have decided to maintain basic compatibility on the outside – -while building the inside from scratch.

As a result, the platforms can be compatible — the same browsers can visit worlds built on both platforms, he said, “without pushing ourselves into a badly-designed corner.”

For example, when Second Life can take thousands more processing cycles to carry out the same functions as OpenSim — and, in some cases, tens of thousands of cycles, said Frisby. “In that respect, emulating Second Life is not a good idea.”

OpenSim will maintain backwards compatibility with Second Life, he said, but cannot be used to move forward.

“OpenSim will continue to evolve,” Krinke agreed. “Not towards 100 percent compatibility with Second Life, but in a direction that all the contributors determine.”

There are already signs of this happening.

For example, Second Life uses a particular types of software to model real-world physics – how objects fall and how they collide with one another. The Second Life software is called Havoc.

“Which we don’t use,” said Krinke.

Instead, OpenSim uses the Open Dynamic Engine, another open source project. Havoc, by comparison, is proprietary. It costs money.

As a result of the different physics engines, objects will always behave just a little bit differently in OpenSim than in Second Life.

In addition, if particular grid operators don’t like the Open Dynamic Engine, they can swap in another one. Today, OpenSim has four physics engines that can be installed.

And if none of those suit – well,  you can write your own. OpenSim is open source. If you’re so inclined, you can tweak it to your heart’s content.

“All the development of OpenSim is based on the contributions of the folks that submit original authorship of source code,” he said.

A core team of contributors decides which additions make it into the core build, he added. Altogether, there are about two dozen programmers working on the platform, with another 150 people contributing patches.

That larger group includes engineers from Intel and Microsoft, from IBM, and from other places, he said.


One way that OpenSim is likely to stay different from Second Life is in its currency system.

On the Internet, every website decides payments on its own. Some online merchants take credit cards, some take PayPal, some use Google Checkout.

Building a currency system into the core of OpenSim would limit what individual grid operators would be able to do.

Second Life, by comparison, isn’t just a platform but also a content provider – and it has its own mechanism to ensure that it gets paid for its content.

Instead of comparing OpenSim to Second Life, Krinke suggested comparing OpenSim to Apache, the very leading Web server platform. Apache, which is also open-source, is modular, Krinke said. Owners of websites can plug in the modules they need.

OpenSim is similar in that operators can install different modules for payment, for voice, and for other functions.

Related Posts'

Maria Korolov

Maria Korolov is editor and publisher of Hypergrid Business. She has been a journalist for more than twenty years and has worked for the Chicago Tribune, Reuters, and Computerworld and has reported from over a dozen countries, including Russia and China. Follow me on Twitter @MariaKorolov.

8 Responses

  1.' Nebadon says:

    great article but people should know we have not reached 95% compatibilty with Second Life, only our scripting capabilities have, while we are making great strides with opensimulator, the article should be titles, OpenSimulator Scripting reaches 95% compatibility with Second Life, but this is also a misnomer, as our simulators can not run nearly as many scripts as a Second Life simulator can, so we really do have a long road a head in terms of fine tuning and optimizing.. we need to make sure we are not overselling OpenSimulator.

  2. Clarification from Adam Frisby:

    "The 95% figure refers to LSL function compatibility (and may be a bit less than that if we discount functions that have bugs in them). I’m not sure where overall compatibility sits – for that we would probably need to compile a huge feature list and do check offs. "

    Note: LSL is the Linden Lab scripting language, and enables animations, vehicles, and other complex object behavior.

  3. Personal note: given that OpenSim offers hypergrid teleportation capability (links between various grids) and allows a company to run its own virtual world on its own terms (and upgrade schedule), this already gives OpenSim a significant edge over Second Life.

    Sure, it's not perfect. But neither is any other virtual world platform out there. And, more to the point, even some very mature software platforms have problems. Windows has been known to crash, for example — but that doesn't stop companies from using it.

    If a company doesn't need the hyperlinks, and doesn't want to run its own servers, then Second Life is a great place to do occasional events, and it's still the best place to find large groups of people.

  4. Clarification from Charles Krinke:

    “Each of us has a slightly different perception of “doneness,” or “compatibility” with Second Life.

    “I would say a fair statement is that our goal has been for 95% compatibility between the server and the Second Life client. That means we expect the Second Life client to work with OpenSim with minimal difficulties.

    “I would also say that 90% of the LSL functions are implemented, but would also have to caution that there are bugs and incomplete implementations in up to 50 others.

    “I would also say that our release, currently about 0.6.4 represents another view of doneness, that of somewhere in the 60% to 70% Second Life feature complete. This would be a measure of the whole sim and not just LSL compatibility.

    “In general, I would also strive to be conservative and not oversell OpenSim. There are quite a few folks using OpenSim that feel it is further along then it is, and it hurts my heart when these folks get frustrated.”

  5.' Ener Hax says:

    this is HUGE news! congrats to all those making this happen! the ability to deploy and use OpenSim for everything from using is as a film studio (biased here toward Subquark), to education, to meetings and collaboration is staggering

    think you for bringing this closer to easier implementation by "regular" folk. i don't see giving up Second Life anytime soon (have 12 sims) but in the case of Subquark, he has two publishers hot and heavy on an elearning book which he won't do using SL, so OpenSim is the obvious answer

    well, if you guys ever make it into SL (i am sure you do), then a virtual martini is on me!!!

    congratulations and good luck making even more strides, you are tireless, passionate, and wicked smart!

    thank you from this little avatar =D

  1. May 10, 2009

    […] OpenSim reaches 95% compatibility with Second Life OpenSim is getting there, but the real news will be when we start seeing the creative community putting down roots here. That’s when you’ll know it’s going to stick. […]

  2. June 1, 2009

    […] 2009-06-02 by torrid in Improvement.  permlink | (comments disabled) | trackback […]

  3. July 7, 2009

    […] reimplementation is nearly complete, Charles Krinke, one of the main Opensim developers has stated that Opensim reached 95% compatibility with Second Life, new methods to legally copy your SL content to Opensimulator based regions have sprung up, and the […]